Thursday, February 26, 2026

Lump Sum vs. DCA vs. Crash Buying??

I came across this very interesting debate by a few YouTube finfluencers.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hZK9vA756LA&t=2467s

In terms of academic discourse, I give this debate 100/100.

I think we need more of these debates to really dive deep into all these strategies: lump sum, DCA, crash buying.

Financial education has really increased by leaps and bounds since I first started investing 20 years ago.

Utimately these debates are not about who wins, but to get to the ultimate source of truth.

This is really the Socratic method: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Socratic_method

The debate can get quite technical at times, so here's a summary:


Overview of Lump Sum, DCA, Crash Buying

Lump Sum Investing

  • Definition: This method involves investing a sizable amount of money all at once the moment it is available, rather than waiting for specific market conditions or timing.
  • Practicality: The experts suggest that "pure" lump sum investing rarely exists in real life for most people, as they typically don't have frequent large windfalls (like an inheritance). Instead, most people save up money over time, which begins to resemble a series of smaller lump sums or Dollar Cost Averaging.
  • Performance: Statistically, lump sum investing tends to outperform crash buying about two-thirds of the time because the market is on an upward trend approximately 70% of the time.

Dollar Cost Averaging (DCA)

  • Definition: DCA is the practice of breaking a larger sum into smaller amounts and investing them at regular intervals.
  • Strategy: The goal is to maximize time in the market rather than attempting to time the market's ups and downs.
  • Benefits: It is often considered executionally easier because it can be automated, which helps investors avoid "chickening out" during periods of high volatility. It also helps younger investors build "stamina" for market fluctuations by keeping them constantly engaged in the market.
  • Drawback: While it often yields higher returns than crash buying by avoiding "cash drag," it can lead to bloodier drawdowns (larger paper losses) if the market crashes after a period of regular buying.

Crash Buying

  • Definition: This strategy involves holding "dry powder" (cash) and waiting for the market to drop by a specific threshold (e.g., 10%, 20%, or 30%) before deploying capital.
  • Methodology: Mr. Loo describes a "two-bucket" system where Method 1 involves deploying smaller amounts at tiered drop levels, while Bucket 2 is reserved for what is identified as the market "bottom".
  • Philosophy: It prioritizes managing emotional risk and minimizing drawdowns over maximizing total returns. It is often preferred by older investors who may not have the time or temperament to stomach significant portfolio drops.
  • Requirements: To be successful, it requires a powerful financial safety net (such as CPF) and intense preparation to ensure the investor has the "balls of steel" to buy when the news is most terrifying.
  • Criticism: The primary risk is cash drag—the loss of potential gains while cash sits on the sidelines waiting for a crash that may not happen for years.


On why Lump Sum does not exist

  • Lack of Frequent Windfalls: He notes that most people do not have the privilege of receiving large, sizable amounts of money (like an inheritance or massive windfall) on a regular basis. While some might get a significant bonus once a year, this is an infrequent event for the average person.
  • The Saving Process: For the vast majority of investors, a "lump sum" is actually the result of saving money over a period of time. He argues that this process of accumulation is not far from crash buying or dollar-cost averaging because it takes time to build up the capital before it is deployed.
  • Gravitation Toward DCA: Mr. Loo explains that because people typically save and invest from their monthly income, the strategy naturally resembles Dollar Cost Averaging (DCA) rather than a true lump sum. He clarifies that "lump sum investing does not exist in real life but abstractly speaking is actually gravitating towards dollar cost averaging".
  • Theoretical vs. Practical: He concludes that while lump sum exists as an abstract financial concept, it is nearly impossible to execute in its "purest form"—investing a massive chunk of cash the moment it is available without any timing—because that cash is rarely available all at once without a prior period of saving.

These YouTube finfluencers definitely have a role to play in financial education. 

Keep up the fantastic work!

 

2 comments:

  1. https://dividendpassiveincome.blogspot.com/2026/02/mr-loo-strikes-back-at-kelvin-learns.html
    The comment by Newbie Investor in that blogspot was spot on....

    I named my blog buyaftercrash way back in 2016 way before crash buying was a thing (there was a crash in 2016 and I bought after that crash) To me the concept of crash buying is simple. Most investors are not 100% equity.

    Lets say the investor is 70/30. This means that when there is a crash, you have 30% cash/near-cash/fixed income that can be used to buy stocks after a crash. This could mean you temporarily deviate from your target asset allocation in order to take advantage of a crash, but later on, after market recovers, you take steps to move back to the original allocation.

    On the other hand, if you are 100% equity, crash buying is theoretically still possible if you are willing to leverage, but the market can remain irrational longer than one can remain solvent.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yes that comment makes sense :P

      You are right, crash buying works for you as a 70/30 investor. However having 70% equities means you are more of a seasoned investor.

      I guess the point of the younger finfluencers is that for those newbie investors with 100% cash + 0% equities, if they were to dump all their cash into equities in a crash buy, it will be an emotional roller coaster for them.

      Delete